Recently,
an exhausted caregiver came into my office wanting desperately to understand
what well-meaning friends and family meant when they urged her to look after
herself. She said that
she was confused because, if she looked after herself she was not looking after
her loved one, abandoning her role as caregiver and, in her own mind at least, not
caring for him. She simply could not do
that.
Similarly,
she found herself unable to delegate.
She said, “If I ask for help, and someone steps in for me, I will not be
there for him. I have to be there for
him”. She teared up, at a total loss.
Caregivers cannot
just set aside their dependents without ceasing to be who they are. They are attendants to someone else’s needs,
other-centered, not self-centered. For a
caregiver to care for himself is… an oxymoron. He cannot focus on himself. It may not be for a lifetime, but it may
well be for the duration of someone else’s life.
Our
conversation reminded of what my old mentor, Robert Misrahi, said about responsibility;
that it comes from the word respond, to answer.
When one answers with one’s heart, it is a complete, whole person kind
of experience. It is an embodied gift,
not the dry, robotic and rather empty offering which comes from a sense of duty
or impersonal obligation.
If you
are a caregiver and a friend asks you to look after yourself, explain that you cannot do that right now but maybe your friend can look after you a little so you can continue to be there for someone else.
Yes, spot on!
ReplyDeleteGlad it resonates, DD!
DeleteSometimes it's a money thing, you don't want to spend on yourself what might be needed by them.
DeleteI am sure it is!! Money, symbol of what we value...
DeleteSo true ��
ReplyDelete