~ Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama
The recent event depicted in the photo has sparked debate about the meaning of this gesture and whether or not it constitutes "abuse". My own view is rather simple and consistent, I think, with the view of compassion expressed in the quote above.
First of all, I'd like to disclose that I have had several Buddhist teachers, all of whom had issues with impulsivity in relationships. One of them had a history of boundary violations with women including me, and whose teacher was also associated with scandal and abuse.
There is a long list of Buddhist teachers who have been called out on their misconduct. Here is a sample. One would like to think that a religion promoting love and compassion would know how to practice it, but the reality is not so. There seems to be a basic lack of understanding about what compassion looks like in real life.
Back to the point of this blog post.
The problem is we tend to equate compassion with good intentions, a heart full of love and kindness, and being positively disposed toward another. While this may be good in itself, it does not mean that our actions will not cause harm to someone else, and remains a mere sentimental notion of compassion.
Compassion means to suffer with, i.e. with another person, and cannot be measured by intentions alone.
In order to be compassionate (and not just have compassion), we need to think about the one who will be impacted by our actions, ideally before we act. We need to ask ourselves some questions like: how will my actions be perceived? How will they be received? Am I putting this person in an uncomfortable situation? Do they have even a choice? Am I imposing myself or my affection on them?
Compassion requires reflecting, not upon myself and my intentions, but upon the other person. Compassionate action is the fruit of reflection, not the spontaneous expression of good intentions, no matter how kind.
