[Note to readers: all published exchanges are edited to remove any identifying information about the querent.]
Question:
When I was dating my last boyfriend, our relationship came to a
standstill. We talked, and he suggested
we take a time-out to think about it. My
boyfriend seemed hesitant about continuing with me and, although we hadn’t had
sex in a while and the relationship was at best lukewarm, I found his
suggestion insulting. It was like he was
breaking up with me but wanting to keep me on the back burner in case he couldn’t
find anyone else. It really pissed me
off.
A few days later, I went out with the girls. I had a few drinks and realized that I had no
more feelings for my boyfriend. He’d
hurt me, I’d lost respect for him, and it was over. I made out with a guy I met at the bar. It was nice to feel like someone was into me. What a difference from my ex!
When he (my ex) eventually called after a couple of weeks, he suggested
we remain friends, and I happily agreed.
I told him that, in a way, I was relieved because I knew he had already
withdrawn from “us” and that we’d reached a point of no-return. I told him that making out with someone else brought
this home to me even more. We could both
do better.
Well, to my surprise, he was really offended. He accused me of “cheating”! I didn't think I
was cheating until he said that, and now I am second-guessing myself.
Can you cheat on someone if, in your own mind, the relationship is over? (I think you wrote somewhere that having an
affair was indicative of a marital breakdown.
That’s exactly how I saw it, like our relationship was breaking down and
my boyfriend was ditching me, and that I had every reason to try with someone
else).
But, objectively speaking, on the basis of facts, is my situation “cheating”?
Answer:
Great question!
The way I see it is like this: betrayal is a subjective experience that
cannot always be determined on the basis of facts alone.
If you've made an explicit promise to someone and then broken it, that would
be objectively verifiable. But most betrayals occur due to breaking
implicit agreements and promises, and these are not so readily verified.
There are two different points of view to consider. Yours and your ex-boyfriend's.
From your own point of view, as you said, you had "no more feelings”
for your boyfriend so- for you- the relationship was over and, technically, you
cannot betray a relationship that doesn't exist.
But there is also your boyfriend's point of view: was the relationship over
for him, or was he still in it but just "thinking about it"? If
so, he was betrayed, whether you intended to betray him or not, just as you
presumably felt betrayed by his unilaterally calling a time-out.
The truth is: when it comes to subjective experiences- one event experienced
by two different people- there is no one truth. There are at least two.
And, if we are ambivalent or confused, there may be even more.
re: what I said about affairs- a person may have a “reason” to want to look outside
the marriage for satisfaction, but a reason does not make an affair less of a
betrayal, unless of course your partner has already betrayed a promise, even an
implicit one (for example, by abandoning you), which is in fact another way of exiting
the relationship.
My advice: don't get hooked into trying to determine whether you were right
or wrong according to some objective standard about “what cheating is”.
If you want to know the truth, consider everyone’s perspective. Find out
whether and how someone felt betrayed, and the part- if any- you or he played
in that, whether intentionally or not. That, in my opinion, is as close
to the truth as you can get.
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Thursday, July 18, 2013
help! my anorexic daughter won't eat!
Question:
We really don't know what to do
about Amanda’s anorexia at this point. We saw the nutritionist on Tuesday
and Amanda participated reluctantly. She
tells me she’s been eating everything but her sister told me privately that
Amanda barely eats when I am not around and that this morning she didn’t have
breakfast.
We know she's lied to us plenty in
the past few months. I can tell her that I think she's not being truthful
with me but, if she denies it (she can really put on an act), I'm not sure what
else to do. I can't put her sister in
the middle of this but I feel like we have to tell Amanda that we know that she
has lied.
At this point, she's decided not to
take anti-depressants, she isn't complying with the eating plan, and I’m
worried she’s going to end up right back in the hospital. Basically, she
has to choose to start trying to actually get better.
Do you think I should confront her
with her behavior?
Answer:
It’s really hard to know what to do
sometimes...
Why don't you tell Amanda that you
have doubts about her commitment to getting better and that you need to know
where she stands on her own treatment and recovery. If she says she's
committed to the process, don’t try to confront her with any lies or
hearsay. Encourage her to continue
trying; and let it go. If Amanda is lying, the truth will eventually
emerge because she will be weighed during her medical appointments and any
weight loss will become apparent over time. If Amanda responds that she
is not committed to getting better or is struggling, let her know that she may
be hospitalized again if she loses more weight, and that this will merely
postpone her recovery.
Either way, you have to let Amanda
face the consequences of her choices and behavior. Ambivalence around autonomy is a major
struggle for anorexics and Amanda has to work it out in order to move
forward. If you take it upon yourself to get her to eat, you will
perpetuate an unhealthy dependency on you.
I know it’s tricky because her behavior is irresponsible and, as her mom, your instinct is to step in; but she has to own her
life.
In terms of her sister, you are
right to not involve her. Amanda may be
baiting you by telling her sister “secrets” that will make it back to you, and
it is best not to encourage any indirect communication. What Amanda says is
less important than what she actually does.
Sunday, May 26, 2013
What if I DON’T have OCD?
It's not time to worry yet.
~ Harper Lee; To Kill a Mockingbird
Question:
I've been doing great, but I'm
writing again because I stumbled upon a very tricky obsession, and it's a very tricky
one indeed and I can't get seem to get my mind around it: "What if I DON’T
have OCD?"
I have OCD but still doubt that I have OCD even though
I know I had compulsions that started in childhood. I used to go up and down the
stairs a lot, and had trouble with light switches at a pretty young age! Heck,
I remember seeing the episode from Scrubs starring Michael J Fox as an OCD
surgeon only 4 years ago and I could identify with him! I didn't' doubt my compulsions
or memories then like I do now! Now my thoughts seem
to compulsively doubt themselves, including the thought that I have OCD. It's ridiculous! Why is this happening to me?
I did a bit of a "brief"
online research about obsessive thinking.
Mistrusting the diagnosis seems to be part of the pathology. Am I
right? If not, I don't know what the [bleep!]
I have. Would it mean that all my
concerns are founded? Sheesh!
Basically, it all boils down to
this: "Why can't I believe I have OCD when I clearly remember having
struggled with so many compulsions?"
Answer:
Sorry to hear that you are
struggling.
Is there a pattern?
Do you find yourself doubting yourself more at night, on the weekend, when? Are you possibly more tired, bored, hungry or lonely at these times? Any
compromised state will make it harder for you to step away from the vortex of
obsessive thoughts. Try to keep that in
mind.
If, like most of us, you tend to be more broody in the wee hours, do not trust the counsels of the night and instead encourage yourself, Ã la
Scarlett O'Hara to "think about that tomorrow; tomorrow is another
day".
Now to answer your question:
I think mistrust of a diagnosis is part of the pathology. Am I right?
Yes. You are right.
That can happen! And I think that
this is exactly what is going on in your case.
The suffering as a result of your kind of OCD is really
intense, precisely because of the inability of obsessive thoughts to let go their
grip so you can come to a place of rest, and think and feel "Ah! Everything’s fine". When
thoughts compulsively gravitate to doubts including
doubts about your own thoughts, they'll trip up your thinking with knots that you can't undo by worrying them like a
string of beads. You'll just get caught in the loop.
There is no way to stop yourself from having thoughts, but you can
manage compulsive worrying by stepping away from the vortex of doubt, avoid the worry loop and
reinforce a few simple truths:
You are sane.
You are okay.
You "just" have OCD.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)